Tuesday, January 19, 2010

The Wizard of Earthsea





The Wizard of Earthsea is a fantasy book that catches the imagination in a different way from Harry Potter or the Golden Compass. To me The Wizard of Earthsea was a different level at in which I had a difficult time connecting to as a reader.  I could never picture myself in the land of Earthsea or a friend to Ged.  This to me made the read difficult to get through. However, I did find the importance of naming interesting.  Naming in The Wizard of Earthsea is a deeply emotional process. Until a person is at the right age they do not even know their own name.  When a wizard shares his name with another person they become vulnerable, but this vulnerability creates a bond between them that is unique from other people.  The true name of a person is connected to the very essence of that individual.  Ged and Vetch have a relationship in which they know each other’s real names. This bond is what helps Ged overcome his shadow.  Its not that Vetch literally help Ged fight his shadow, because Ged had to accomplish that on his own, its that he was a true friend that encouraged him and gave him motivation to fight and overcome the shadow. Naming other things besides people, such as plants or animals is what gives wizards their power to control them.  This ancient language is a language of truth and cannot be used to lie.  This is an important issue when he defeats the dragons. Overall naming people and things gives wizards a power that is unique and can disrupt the equilibrium of Earthsea if used improperly. This is one of the many reasons Ged’s journey is so pivotal. 

5 comments:

  1. I completely agree with how difficult it was trying to relate to the character of Ged and the setting of Earthsea. In Harry Potter, it is so well described that I feel like I am another student at Hogwarts just hanging out with Hermione, Harry and Ron. I will say that as I got further into the novel (past the first three chapters) it really did help captivate me enough to finish the book.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I second what Callie said as far as not being able to relate to Ged. As Ged made more contacts, especially after he loosed the shadow and learned some humanity, I came to like him better. I thought it was sad that Vetch gave away his sister's name to Ged when she was not there. I think that sharing names would be a strictly personal exchange; she should have told him if she wanted him to know.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I never thought about how important naming was. I mean I knew it was important and I heard everyone talk about it in class, but until just now I didn't really realize HOW important the true names of things are.

    I think you made a good point about naming things, especially when you said, "The true name of a person is connected to the very essence of that individual." If this is something I would have thought more about while reading, I think I would have seen the deeper connection between Vetch and Ged, which would have made my reading more enjoyable.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with the importance of naming. By allowing people to know your true name you are allowing people to know you entirely. I think that the reason we, as readers were not able to connect to the characters is because we have nothing like this. There is nothing in our society that can be said to let someone in completely. We can tell someone one of our secrets, however; it is still nothing like giving someone the privilege of the "true name." I think that because I could not competely understand naming, I was not able to connect with the characters.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think this novel was a difficult read because there was no strong emotional attachment to the characters. It was well into the book that we started to see any redeeming qualities from Ged. The wizards seemed to be reserved people and it focused on abilities and powers.

    I also think naming was very significant because it gave them a human-like characteristic that we could relate to more. That even though it was not overt, there was a intimate bond in sharing a part of yourself with another that was not known to all.

    ReplyDelete